Does it make a difference to our students' learning if we acknowledge (or don't acknowledge) non-European sources of mathematics? Why, or how?
If we do or do not acknowledge the non-European sources of mathematics, for most of our students, I don’t think it will make a difference as long as they learn what they are suppose to learn as prescribed on the curriculum. I think it will only make a difference to those who are interested in knowing more about mathematic history. For example, if we acknowledge the Greek and Chinese sources of mathematics, students who are interested in the Chinese or Greek culture may be more attracted to the information presented. However, as teachers, it is worth noting other non-European sources of matematics so their students recognize that there are other people in the worlds who also contributed to the knowledge we are learning today. Nobody's contribution should not be ignored.
What are your thoughts about the naming of the Pythagorean Theorem, and other named mathematical theorems and concepts (for example, Pascal's Triangle...check out its history.)
It is interesting to see that most mathematical theorems and concepts are named after the main contributor who discovered or proved the theorems in the Western culture. Whereas the Chiense had named their theorems and concepts differently. For example, the Pythagorean Theorem is named Gougu Theorem in Chinese because ancient Chinese called the right triangle "gougu". I like the idea to have theorems and conpcets named after the contributors/founders because it show apprecitaion and acknowledgement to their hard work.